Monday, June 30, 2014

These Ancient Elongated Skulls Are NOT HUMAN

These Ancient Elongated Skulls Are NOT HUMAN
By Michael Snyder, on January 16th, 2014

     Are you ready to be confronted with evidence that will directly contradict the version of “world history” that you were taught in school?  In recent years, hundreds of extremely bizarre skulls have been discovered all over the planet.  Scientific tests that have been conducted on some of them conclusively prove that these ancient elongated skulls are NOT HUMAN.  Many people are not able to accept what you are about to see because it is too radical for them.  But the truth is that ancient texts have been telling us about these “hybrid beings” for thousands of years.  There are even some ancient Indian traditions that claim that these creatures were in North America before the Indians were.  In fact, there is even one ancient Indian tradition about a war between a tribe of Indians and a race of red-haired cannibalistic giants.  The Bible refers to these hybrids as “the Nephilim”, and as time goes by the evidence keeps piling up that they were very, very real.
Down in Peru, particularly on the Paracas peninsula, researchers have been finding some very large elongated skulls that are extremely ancient.  On his Facebook page, Brien Foerster posted a photo of one of these ancient skulls that still has red hair on it…
Another specimen with red hair was just recently discovered.  But this one was the skull of a young child.  This photo is also from Brien Foerster’s Facebook page
These elongated skulls are much, much larger than normal human skulls would be.  Purposeful cranial deformation can change the shape of a skull, but it cannot increase the volume of the skull.
In addition, these skulls have quite a few other important physical characteristics that greatly set them apart from normal human skulls.  Brien Foerster discusses some of these key differences in the following five minute video

برای دیدن ویدیو ها به سایت منبع مراجعه کنید.

In a recent interview with the Examiner, Foerster explained that his research has led him to the conclusion that these creatures are either “a different species” or are “a mix of human and alien DNA”…
Examiner: In a recent video, “Alien Hybrid Human Baby Found In Peru?,” you show the remains of a baby with an elongated skull as well as a fetus with an elongated skull. Do you have any theories why these babies may have developed naturally with misshapen skulls?
Foerster: These examples are completely natural in shape, and have enormous cranial volume. They are either a different species from us, or, possibly, are a mix of human and alien DNA.
A sample of the red hair from one of these skulls was sent to a lab to be analyzed.  What was discovered was absolutely mind blowing.  You can watch researcher L.A. Marzulli discuss what the lab found starting at the ten minute mark of the following video

برای دیدن ویدیو ها به سایت منبع مراجعه کنید.
Other teams of researchers have come to similar conclusions about these ancient elongated skulls.  For example, the following is an excerpt from a Daily Mail article that was posted back in 2011
A mummified elongated skull found in Peru could finally prove the existence of aliens.
The strangely shaped head – almost as big as its 50cm (20in) body – has baffled anthropologists.
It was one of two sets of remains found in the city of Andahuaylillas in the southern province of Quispicanchi.
When an international team of anthropologists studied the skull that was found, they also agreed that it was “not a human being“…
Davila Riquelme said three anthropologists, from Spain and Russia, arrived at the museum last week to investigate the findings and agreed it was ‘not a human being’ and would conduct further studies.
He added: ‘Although the assessment was superficial, it is obvious that its features do not correspond to any ethnic group in the world.’
Another ancient skull that has caused a lot of controversy in recent years is the so-called “Starchild Skull”.  The following is a photo of the “Starchild Skull” compared with the skull of a normal human…
Obviously the physical differences are very great.  But the Starchild Project wanted to go even farther.  They wanted to do extensive DNA testing on the skull to determine how close to human this creature actually was…
For 13 years we at the Starchild Project have known the Starchild Skull came from a being that was not entirely human, if human at all. First, it shares no physical characteristics with a normal human skull—none! Unfortunately, this astounding divergence in physical points of comparison never impressed mainstream scientists because they could, and often did, glibly explain all of them away by insisting: Nature can do anything! But that was never true.
Nature actually functions by strict rules that confine life to well-defined boundaries outlined by the unique genetic code of each species. No laws are more firmly established than the laws of genetics. Fifty eye-witnesses can say that a person committed a crime, but if DNA shows otherwise, the witnesses are ignored. DNA dominates in courts because it is the math of biology. It says what it says, again and again, with consistency you can stake your life on.
When they came back, the DNA test results were absolutely shocking.  The following is a brief excerpt from the report
In terms of this all-important mtDNA in the Starchild, our geneticist has recovered four reasonably large fragments which together total 1,583 base pairs, or 9.55% of the 16,569 base pair total for humans. As before, this is only a partial result, but also as before, it is highly indicative of what the final result of a full mtDNA genome analysis will be.
Within those 1,583 base pairs, the Starchild carries a grand total of 93 variations that are different from the extremely highly conserved human mtDNA genome. That is 93 in only 9.5% of the genome! It’s already near to the maximum of 120 variations in human mtDNA. If we do a simple but highly reliable mathematical extrapolation, expanding the 9.5% out to 100% (times 10.5) we find that 93 established variations extrapolates out to 977 variations!
You can read the rest of the report right here, and I have posted video of researcher Lloyd Pye discussing the Starchild skull below…
For even more on all of this, please check out my previous article entitled “13 Nephilim Skulls Found In Mexico?
The evidence continues to mount that “people” other than humans once roamed the earth.  The Bible refers to them as “the Nephilim“.  Other ancient texts have other names for them.  The Paiute Indians claim to have once fought a war against a race of red-haired cannibalistic giants in Nevada.  In fact, a handprint from one of those giants can still be found in a nearby cave.
But many people out there will never be willing to even consider any of this.  Since it does not fit with the “accepted view of history” that they have always been taught, they will just dismiss all of this without even evaluating the evidence.
What about you?
What do you think about all of this?
Please feel free to share your thoughts by posting a comment below…
About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

نواي ني در ني‌ستان

نواي ني در ني‌ستان



سخناني كه درپي‌مي‌آيد، چون از دل برامده، اميدست بر دل نيز نشيند؛ و هرگاه كارگردان نمايشي اهل‌دل و باذوق‌وانگيره‌اي، بتواند اين احساس‌هاي ناب را به گونة يك ميان‌پردة نمايشي تك‌گويي(مونولوگ) به‌اجرا‌دراورد، كار شايسته‌اي انجام‌داده‌است.

تصوركنيد صحنه‌اي را كه پرده كنارمي‌رود و در تاريكي مطلق، نوري متغير، از نورافشان بالاي صحنه، بر روي انساني با هياًتي همچون شكل‌وشمايلي كه مسيحيان براي حضرت عيسي مسيح(ع) ترسيم مي‌كنند، بتابد. كه البته اين انسان سربه‌گريبان‌دارد و بر روي زمين نشسته؛ و پس از زمان كوتاهي، درحالي‌كه دستهاي خود را به سوي آسمان بلندمي‌كند، با لحني طلبكارانه لب‌ به ‌سخن‌مي‌گشايد: « تو بودي كه تنهاي تنها بودي و »

دربارة ادامة حركتهاي اين انسان و صحنة‌كار، كارگردان بهتر مي‌تواند نظردهد.



آن انسان نيز سه چهره دارد:

هم نماد حضرت «آدم»(ع)، هم نماد انسان مطلق، و هم نمادي از انسان سرگشتة امروزي است.





كلامي چند از بن جان در لحظاتي با "او"



هل‌اتي‌ علي‌الانسان ‌حين ‌من‌الدّهر لم‌يكن شيئا مذكوراً (انسان: 1)



تو بودي كه تنهاي ‌تنها بودي ‌و دوست‌داشتي شهرة آفاق ‌بشي كه شدي!

پس ديگه چرا منو خرابم‌كردي. راه ديگه‌اي وجود‌نداشت؟

خوب نادوني رو گيرآوردي. من نادون رو بگو، گير چه دانايي افتادم!!



تو خيلي فتّاني. تو شيطون رو هم درس‌مي‌دي؛

اما من من، خنگ‌ونادون‌بودم. من كه چيزي نمي‌دونستم.

اگر زرنگ بودم و چيز مي‌دونستم كه به دام تو نمي‌افتادم و گرفتار تو نمي‌شدم.



 تو هم منو يادم‌دادي، هم دشمنو يادش‌دادي.

اما من تجربه‌اي نداشتم و تو چاه دشمن افتادم.

بعد هم منو از خودت واكردي و ول‌كردي.



يادت مي‌آد يادم‌دادي چكاركنم پيشت بيام؟

حالا بازم اومدم پيش تو؛

تا دردامو دواكني؛ تا منو از خودم رهاكني؛

تا آبروم ريختـه نشـه، تا پرده‌ها پاره نشـه.



تو كه مي‌گفتي آبرومو محفوظ‌مي‌كني عيبامو مستورمي‌كني،

پس نذار عيبامو مردم بدونن. دشمنا شاد مي‌شن ها ...

اينو خودتم خوب مي‌دوني.

من كه رسواي توام، ديگه منو رسواي آدما نكن، ديگه دشمن‌شادم نكن.



گاهي منـو رنج مـي‌دي، خوب بده!

تحمل‌مي‌كنم، تقصير خودمه ديگه؛

اما بهت بگم؛ تحمل يـه چيزي رو ندارم.

اونهم رنج جداييه، اين ‌هم نوعي گداييه.

چكاركنم, دوستت دارم، فدات شم.



اصلاً مگه مي‌شه تو نباشي در كنار من؟

مگه مي‌شـه سير نكني توي خيال من؟

من تو رو هردم تو خودم حـس مي‌كنم.

تو مثل آب زلال جاري، هردم توي هستيم جاري‌مي‌شي و سيراب‌‌مي‌كني ضمير تشنة منو.



دستاي تو هم، مثل در خونة تو هميشه به روم بازه؛

پس چرا به مهموني دستات نيام؟

اما من يك كمي خجالتي‌ام.

پس دستاي بازت رو با اشارة چشمي همراهش‌كن.

تا به مهموني چشمات بيام.



به خودت قسمت‌مي‌دم، تنهام نذاري ها

هرجا ببري قبوله. فرق‌نمي‌كنه، راه خودت، پيش خودت.

فقط منو دست‌ كسي ‌نسپري ها! كه ناله‌ام ‌درمي‌آد.



هرچي دارم مال توه، هرچي كنم براي توه،

نخواستم. من هيچي رو نخواستم

قلبمو هم دادم به تو، فداي تو.



تو دوست‌داري؟ قبول‌داري؟ شبهامو مهمونت بشم؟

بازار ريسـمونت بشـم؟

شمع شبستونت بشم؟

اگر بشم چه خوش خوشم، هميشه خوشم.



نه شرقي‌ام، نه غربي‌ام، قربون اون بي‌رنگيتم.

قبولم‌داري؟ اگر داري، تو دوست داري روغن چراغ تمثيلت بشم؟

كه اونم بايد نه شرقي باشه، نه غربي باشه، روغـن بي‌رنگي باشه؟



خوب! تو كه مي‌گي دوست مني، دوسم داري،

پس دوستي‌مونو يادت‌نره كه نمي‌ره.

زير قولت ‌نزني كه نمي‌زني،

اگر بزني سر به‌ بيابون مي‌زنم ها...



مگه خودت نمي‌گفتي صدام‌كني جواب‌مي‌دم.

حالا صدات كردم، چرا جواب نمي‌دي؟

كـار بـدي كـردم كه جـواب‌ نمي‌دي؟

جون من جواب‌بده. قربونتم جواب‌بده!

با گوشة چشمي هم كه شده، جواب‌بده!



راستي راسته كه مي‌گن تو گفتي:

تو عاشق معشوق‌كشي! تو معشوق عاشق‌كشي!؟

اما چي شد؟ نفهميدم! تو عاشقي يا معشوق؟ ... يا هم عاشقي هم معشوق؟



من كه نفهميدم. بگو تا منم بدونم تو كي‌هستي من كي‌ام.

آخه اين جوري كه نمي شه

اما نه ... تا حالا كه همين‌جوري‌شو خواستي و شده.

... آره تو همه رو درس‌مي‌دي؛

حتي درس خنّاسي به خنّاس مي‌دي.

كسي نمي‌تونه پيش تو خودي نشون‌بده يا نازوكرشمه كنه، چه برسه به من فقير كه از اولش حلقة بندگي تو رو به‌گوش‌كردم و چاكري تو رو پيشه‌كردم.

اما مي‌دونم تو هم هميشه به من لطف‌داري و باهام مهربوني ... يا حق!



اهل‌دل مي‌دانند مفاهيم اين سخنان برگرفته از كلام‌الله مجيد و احاديث قدسي است. احمد شماع زاده